|
June 2006
LONG ONLY JAPANESE EQUITIES
We have added to our positions in pharmaceutical
shares, partly in response to short term weakness in
prices but also in recognition of the prospect for
steady future dividend growth and accretive share
repurchases.
Takeda Pharmaceutical transformed its business in
the mid 1990's with the launch of four important in
house developed drugs. All have been global sellers,
especially in the USA, with annual sales of between
$1-2bn and $4bn for the largest, Prevacid, an anti-
ulcer drug. Prevacid is distributed in the USA by a
joint venture established with Abbott Laboratories
whereas Actos, an anti-diabetic drug, has been co-
promoted with Eli Lilly until this year when Takeda
takes the responsibility in house. Largely as a result
of the success of these drugs, Takeda, Japan's
largest drug company is the only one in Japan to
boast true global scale, with 67% of its ethical drug
net sales earned outside Japan. Even so it ranks 11th
largest by sales versus other companies illustrating
what minnows Japanese drugs companies are on the
global stage. Size matters as it determines the
resources for the research and development ('R&D')
budget, the source of future sales and profits. For
instance Pfizer's budget is $7.5bn compared to
$1.5bn for Takeda even though it represents the
same percentage of overall sales. Nevertheless, we
are encouraged by the effectiveness of Takeda's R&D
spending as was manifest in the successful
development of the current leading products. As
investors we are crucially dependant on a repeat of
such success in the future, of which there is no
guarantee, but we are confident that the
commitment to R&D will produce a good probability
for future success. Only 12% of Takeda's current
ethical pharmaceutical revenue comes from off-
patent products today but that figure will rise from
2009 when the patent expiries on Prevacid. Much of
today's R&D efforts are concentrated on securing
replacement revenues, which includes buying
compounds in development as well as nurturing in
house developed products. One such product is
Ramelton, a drug designed to counter insomnia,
which is coming to market this year and has similar
encouraging sales potential to some of the current
successful drugs. Takeda plans to distribute it
themselves in the USA with Actos, further optimising
their in house distribution capability. Partly because
of its high percentage of in house developed
products, Takeda earns impressive operating margins,
averaging 32% (adjusting for sales and profits of
affiliates) over the last 5 years, equal with some of
the biggest companies such as Pfizer, Merck and
GSK. It is good to see that over the last 5 years the
company has been steadily reducing its exposure to
legacy peripheral businesses which today account for
13% of overall sales (including sales of affiliates). As
these businesses only produce 4% of operating
profits a further concentration of the business on
ethical drugs would improve margins more and
increase returns on capital. When we bought Takeda
we did so when its enterprise value was under 2x
sales. Today that has increased to just below 3x
sales but well below the 3-4x of sales multiples that
other similarly profitable companies are valued.
Takeda has one of the best annualised dividend
growth rates in the market at 20% over the last 11
years and this
year for the first time ever the company is
supplementing its dividends with share buybacks that
equate in size to another annual dividend.
Astellas is the other ethical pharmaceutical company
we own, though priced considerably cheaper at less
than 2x enterprise value/sales. As the company is
the product of a merger it will be a few years before
we know the real earnings power of the combined
company but we suspect it is higher than currently
reported. Certainly, like Takeda, there is commitment
to R&D spending with 17% of sales allocated last
year and an even higher percentage this year due to
the cost of an acquisition of the licence of new drug
from FibroGen. Like Takeda the company has
invested in externally developed products to
supplement what is developed internally to replace
sales moving off-patent. The company's top selling
drugs Harnal (treatment of enlarged prostrate) and
Prograf (immuno-suppressant for post-transplant
patients) both come off-patent in the next 2 years.
Concentrating on the company's specialism in Urology
it has just launched a promising new drug
this year called Vesicare, which alleviates
incontinence. The company's sales are increasingly
dependant on overseas markets, especially in Europe,
with a third of sales overseas. This is a good
measure of how competitive the company is globally
and differentiates it, and Takeda, from other
Japanese drug companies, like Taisho's
pharmaceutical business mentioned below, who tend
to concentrate on the domestic market alone.
Annualised dividend growth of 12% over the last 11
years has been supplemented with an active share
buyback programme. We have been able to buy
shares recently on a prospective free cash flow yield
above 6% and a dividend yield above 2%, which, in
our view, significantly undervalues future prospects.
We noted with interest Johnson and Johnson's
purchase of Pfizer's consumer health business for
4.3x its sales. Last year Boots sold a similar business
to Reckitt Benckiser for 3.7x its sales. Clearly these
businesses, which at their core sell branded over the
counter ('OTC') medicines, are valuable and sought
after for such heavyweights to pay so much.
Profitability is high with operating profit margins at
18% and 17% respectively. Cash flow is good as well
because many of the products were first introduced
many years ago and have strong brand recognition,
such as Listerine mouthwash and Sudafed cold
medicines. This means that the bulk of expenses are
promotional, in maintaining and enhancing the brand,
rather than hefty spending on research and
development. Taisho Pharmaceutical is Japan's
closest equivalent. The majority its business
specialises in sales of similar branded OTC products
even if its dominant products are tonic drinks which
are exclusive to the Japanese market. Unfortunately,
the company has many problems: profits are overly
reliant on tonic drinks where sales are falling, a
significant minority of the business is the production
and sale of off-patent ethical pharmaceuticals, a
business where the company lacks scale and
resource, versus the likes of larger pharmaceutical
companies such as Takeda or Astellas, supermarkets,
which have become a new and important distribution
channel, are pressuring margins and the family
controlled board seem pedestrian in responding to
these challenges. Not surprisingly, profits have
suffered, falling for the last two years. Nevertheless,
the operating margin is still 17% and the valuation at
2.3x sales, 1.1x enterprise value/sales seems to
ignore its strategic value as Japan's largest consumer
health franchise. We own the shares and take much
comfort from these transaction values as a validation
that there is much more potential value in Taisho's
business than widely recognised.
Michael Lindsell
July 2006
LTL 000-038-1
|